4 ms·

> Why not? You're only addressing one half of my argument. The answer to this is obvious: the default state is that things don't get done unless we have a reas

> Why not? You're only addressing one half of my argument. The answer to this is obvious: the default state is that things don't get done unless we have a reason. So there is a motivation at play and it's perfectly OK to inquire about it, especially if the author appears to be cagey about how the project came to be. If your answer is "it was the author's childhood dream", fair. But that brings me to the second half of the argument: I think we upvote this article in large part because of the historical association of a "crazy 8-bit software project" with "something that took perseverance and skill and our community should reward it". That link is severed now.

gizajob 14d ago
Even a cursory flick through the GitHub page until you reach “Why” shows that to be the answer.
alt227 14d ago
> The default state is that things don't get done unless we have a reason. What about art? People make art and inventions just for the hell of it and to satisfy come itch. Whether or not other people then like it or find it useful is subjective and up to the individual. IMO taking away peoples right to make stuff for no reason and enjoy doing it is to take away our humanity. I upvoted the article because it brought me some nostalgia and entertained me for a bit while I played with it and knowing how to code a spectrum myself, marvelled at the complexity of the code and the project itself. Maybe people have more reasons to enjoy things than your narrow viewpoint allows for?
kejdjejxjejdj 14d ago
> But that brings me to the second half of the argument: I think we upvote this article in large part because of the historical association of a "crazy 8-bit software project" with "something that took perseverance and skill and our community should reward it". That link is severed now. There’s the problem: you are assuming everyone else thinks in elitist terms like you. It still is a crazy 8-bit software project. It still rather impressive and fun to see. Your “historical reason” reads a lot more like whining than anything else and it does come across as a display of insecurity. AI is just a freaking tool. The dev used to tool to bring his vision to life. That’s the extent of it. Stop making such a fuss over something that quite literally was just made for fun. Let people have fun in peace. Let people enjoy things in peace.
- InsideOutSanta 14d ago
  Yeah, I think this is interesting independently of how it was made, because it reveals a kind of "what could have been" alternative history. It's fun to imagine a past where the Speccy got a desktop, and it's fun to see what it could have looked like running on real hardware (or on an emulator).
  - kejdjejxjejdj 14d ago
    Precisely! Anyone who knows the hardware should understand how interesting this project is, regardless of how it came to be. It’s just fun.
jameshart 14d ago
What’s interesting about the project might no longer be ‘wow, someone figured out how to do that, I guess they must have a MASSIVE BRAIN’, but we can still wonder at the fact that the hardware can be made to do such a thing. If someone finds an interesting shiny pebble and shows it to you, is your reaction to say ‘what do you want, a round of applause? You didn’t make that rock’ Can’t you just appreciate the shiny pebble someone went out of their way to find?

gizajob 14d ago

Even a cursory flick through the GitHub page until you reach “Why” shows that to be the answer.

alt227 14d ago

> The default state is that things don't get done unless we have a reason. What about art? People make art and inventions just for the hell of it and to satisfy come itch. Whether or not other people then like it or find it useful is subjective and up to the individual. IMO taking away peoples right to make stuff for no reason and enjoy doing it is to take away our humanity. I upvoted the article because it brought me some nostalgia and entertained me for a bit while I played with it and knowing how to code a spectrum myself, marvelled at the complexity of the code and the project itself. Maybe people have more reasons to enjoy things than your narrow viewpoint allows for?

kejdjejxjejdj 14d ago

> But that brings me to the second half of the argument: I think we upvote this article in large part because of the historical association of a "crazy 8-bit software project" with "something that took perseverance and skill and our community should reward it". That link is severed now. There’s the problem: you are assuming everyone else thinks in elitist terms like you. It still is a crazy 8-bit software project. It still rather impressive and fun to see. Your “historical reason” reads a lot more like whining than anything else and it does come across as a display of insecurity. AI is just a freaking tool. The dev used to tool to bring his vision to life. That’s the extent of it. Stop making such a fuss over something that quite literally was just made for fun. Let people have fun in peace. Let people enjoy things in peace.

InsideOutSanta 14d ago
Yeah, I think this is interesting independently of how it was made, because it reveals a kind of "what could have been" alternative history. It's fun to imagine a past where the Speccy got a desktop, and it's fun to see what it could have looked like running on real hardware (or on an emulator).
- kejdjejxjejdj 14d ago
  Precisely! Anyone who knows the hardware should understand how interesting this project is, regardless of how it came to be. It’s just fun.

jameshart 14d ago

What’s interesting about the project might no longer be ‘wow, someone figured out how to do that, I guess they must have a MASSIVE BRAIN’, but we can still wonder at the fact that the hardware can be made to do such a thing. If someone finds an interesting shiny pebble and shows it to you, is your reaction to say ‘what do you want, a round of applause? You didn’t make that rock’ Can’t you just appreciate the shiny pebble someone went out of their way to find?