11 ms·

I don't understand the negativity. Someone had great time. Why being so negative. Of course no one would have invested time, if not llm's - that wouldn't even e

I don't understand the negativity. Someone had great time. Why being so negative. Of course no one would have invested time, if not llm's - that wouldn't even exist.

kalleboo 15d ago
I want to hear about the great time they had. That would be interesting. Instead I hear about the great time Claude had being prompted to do it. edit: noticed the person who posted this here is not the same as the author. the author appears to have just randomly made the project public without any kind of announcement. so we don't know their intentions.
- kejdjejxjejdj 15d ago
  > Instead I hear about the great time Claude had being prompted to do it. I don’t think anyone is talking or even considering how much fun Claude had coming up with the code for this. Fun is subjective. “A great time” is subjective. The author could have had bucket loads of fun discussing, architecting, rethinking, planning and bringing the project to life through Claude. Or they could have had a miserable time with Claude but just wanted to see the thing working. Maybe both? Maybe neither? The point is: chill. AI is nothing more than a tool. A tool that requires an operator. And like every other tool in human history, it can produce bad results or wonderful results, it all depends on who’s operating it and how much domain knowledge they have. Things aren’t so black and white. Open up your mind a little (crazy concept, I know) and just let people enjoy things.
  - kalleboo 15d ago
    My point is more this was posted without context. I may be interested to read a blog post about the trials and tribulations the creator had, I'm sure there was something interesting going on getting LLMs writing Z80 assembly and testing things on real devices. Not interested in reading an uncurated Claude context summary.
    - kejdjejxjejdj 15d ago
      [dead]

I don't understand the negativity. Someone had great time. Why being so negative. Of course no one would have invested time, if not llm's - that wouldn't even exist.

kalleboo 15d ago

I want to hear about the great time they had. That would be interesting. Instead I hear about the great time Claude had being prompted to do it. edit: noticed the person who posted this here is not the same as the author. the author appears to have just randomly made the project public without any kind of announcement. so we don't know their intentions.

kejdjejxjejdj 15d ago
> Instead I hear about the great time Claude had being prompted to do it. I don’t think anyone is talking or even considering how much fun Claude had coming up with the code for this. Fun is subjective. “A great time” is subjective. The author could have had bucket loads of fun discussing, architecting, rethinking, planning and bringing the project to life through Claude. Or they could have had a miserable time with Claude but just wanted to see the thing working. Maybe both? Maybe neither? The point is: chill. AI is nothing more than a tool. A tool that requires an operator. And like every other tool in human history, it can produce bad results or wonderful results, it all depends on who’s operating it and how much domain knowledge they have. Things aren’t so black and white. Open up your mind a little (crazy concept, I know) and just let people enjoy things.
- kalleboo 15d ago
  My point is more this was posted without context. I may be interested to read a blog post about the trials and tribulations the creator had, I'm sure there was something interesting going on getting LLMs writing Z80 assembly and testing things on real devices. Not interested in reading an uncurated Claude context summary.
  - kejdjejxjejdj 15d ago
    [dead]