3 ms·
AI assisted or not, you have no idea how much of his personal effort went into the project.
by derac 7d ago
AI assisted or not, you have no idea how much of his personal effort went into the project.
- deleted 7d ago[deleted]
- mzi 7d agoNothing else than a bit of prompting went in to this.
- grugagag 7d agoHow about the desire to steer LLMs to a point of their choosing? LLMs wouldn't do this by themselves...
- jameshart 7d agoIf you’re familiar with the way in which documentation artifacts like this fall out of a Claude project, you will recognize that every place where Claude says ‘this changes everything’ or ‘this is the load bearing insight’ most likely resulted from a human looking at what Claude had done, and redirecting it towards a more fruitful line of inquiry. When Claude gets ‘excited’ about a thing like ‘we figured out which clock measurement approach helps us actually optimize performance’ - excited enough to explain it in this level of detail - it usually results from the user pulling Claude out of a rabbit hole where it was going about things the wrong way.
- alt227 7d ago"A bit of prompting" is subjective, and can indeed take a lot of work to craft accurate prompts which produce genuinely useful output.
- kejdjejxjejdj 7d agoI think you severely lack in domain knowledge if you think “nothing else than a bit of prompting went in to this”.
- cindyllm 7d ago[dead]
- exe34 7d agoThis sounds like you have only had a superficial contact with LLMs. They do a lot of mechanical work, but "a bit of prompting" is not how they are used for something like this.