5 ms·
AI assisted or not, you have no idea how much of his personal effort went into the project.
by derac 2mo ago
AI assisted or not, you have no idea how much of his personal effort went into the project.
- deleted 2mo ago[deleted]
- mzi 2mo agoNothing else than a bit of prompting went in to this.
- grugagag 2mo agoHow about the desire to steer LLMs to a point of their choosing? LLMs wouldn't do this by themselves...
- jameshart 2mo agoIf you’re familiar with the way in which documentation artifacts like this fall out of a Claude project, you will recognize that every place where Claude says ‘this changes everything’ or ‘this is the load bearing insight’ most likely resulted from a human looking at what Claude had done, and redirecting it towards a more fruitful line of inquiry. When Claude gets ‘excited’ about a thing like ‘we figured out which clock measurement approach helps us actually optimize performance’ - excited enough to explain it in this level of detail - it usually results from the user pulling Claude out of a rabbit hole where it was going about things the wrong way.
- alt227 2mo ago"A bit of prompting" is subjective, and can indeed take a lot of work to craft accurate prompts which produce genuinely useful output.
- kejdjejxjejdj 2mo agoI think you severely lack in domain knowledge if you think “nothing else than a bit of prompting went in to this”.
- cindyllm 2mo ago[dead]
- exe34 2mo agoThis sounds like you have only had a superficial contact with LLMs. They do a lot of mechanical work, but "a bit of prompting" is not how they are used for something like this.