3 ms·

But do you still have enthusiasm for finding out about new language features or concepts? I'll do what it takes to get the job done, but the passion for it is t

But do you still have enthusiasm for finding out about new language features or concepts? I'll do what it takes to get the job done, but the passion for it is totally gone.

tonyhart7 7d ago
nothing stopping you to code manually
- karmakurtisaani 7d ago
  Nothing stopping me from doing a lot of things. But is there any point to it?
  - layer8 7d ago
    Meaningfulness comes from what you care about. I wonder why you were interested in programming-language concepts before but now (apparently) stopped caring about the code. The code still remains the language that communicates the actual program logic.
    - karmakurtisaani 7d ago
      I guess a large part of my motivation was that it makes me a more effective and skilled programmer. There are countless of interesting things out there, and the motivation to focus on one comes from what you do with it later on.
frje1400 7d ago
Yes, as an example structured concurrency in Java (final release in Java 28 perhaps). I think that could totally change how we write concurrent code in that language. I just upgraded a less important service to Java 27, a few days after its release (several nice features). It's cool how easy it is to upgrade nowadays. That an agent writes most of the code doesn't mean anything to me here. My examples are Java because that is the main language where I work.
- karmakurtisaani 7d ago
  Thanks for the perspective.
  - frje1400 7d ago
    You're welcome. I now feel inspired to try to change your mind, if you don't mind. I would argue that "concepts" actually are more important than ever. Let's take my structured concurrency example. It doesn't matter here exactly what is, but if it ends up being as important as I think it will be, I likely want to write most concurrent code that way going forward. However, it will likely be years until agents go to it unless deliberately steered in that direction. And if I want to make agents write it, I need to review it, and if I'm going to review, I need to understand it. I think this is why I'm not pessimistic about the profession, it still feels like what I'm doing and learning matters.
    - slopinthebag 6d ago
      just chiming in to say that i agree with you. i initially felt demotivated and passionless but the more i use llms to generate code the more i feel like knowledge of the concepts are crucial to generating useful code. eg. you dont need to memorise sorting algorithms or be able to write them, but you do need to understand the concept of sorting, and the concept of time complexity, etc etc. knowing what data structures to use and when to use them. knowing how to structure concurrency for your problem space. many many concepts. system design is becoming the most important thing, and to me it's also the most interesting part of creating software. and there will always be more to know.
za3faran 7d ago
There's a couple of languages I follow their roadmap and I find exciting, including Java and C#. I don't feel there's proper justification of writing backend services in something like python or ruby anymore, for example.
- karmakurtisaani 7d ago
  Yeah, I also try to follow what's new. But it's more like "Ok, that's good I guess." Rather than "Cool! Looking forward to applying this in my next project!"
- pjmlp 7d ago
  Never was really, at least if performance matters.
- NetMageSCW 7d ago
  I found C# exciting when it was new and adding features that were important to me, but now it feels like it has become bogged down with chunks just abandoned on the alter of backwards compatibility (Expression, anyone?) and adding features I couldn’t care less about (null safe code, pattern matching, etc).
  - Quothling 6d ago
    I worked with C# for a decade around the transition from .net to .net core to .net. I've come to really dislike it as a language because of it's implicity and abstractions but I'm surprised that you're not finding the new features intereting. All the work on immutability seems pretty awesome to me at least. Sure it's still this bastard version where you build "readonly" objects and put them into immutable collections, but I assume they'll work on this going forward. I'm never going back to it, but I do think it's the best it's ever been.

But do you still have enthusiasm for finding out about new language features or concepts? I'll do what it takes to get the job done, but the passion for it is totally gone.

tonyhart7 7d ago

nothing stopping you to code manually

karmakurtisaani 7d ago
Nothing stopping me from doing a lot of things. But is there any point to it?
- layer8 7d ago
  Meaningfulness comes from what you care about. I wonder why you were interested in programming-language concepts before but now (apparently) stopped caring about the code. The code still remains the language that communicates the actual program logic.
  - karmakurtisaani 7d ago
    I guess a large part of my motivation was that it makes me a more effective and skilled programmer. There are countless of interesting things out there, and the motivation to focus on one comes from what you do with it later on.

frje1400 7d ago

Yes, as an example structured concurrency in Java (final release in Java 28 perhaps). I think that could totally change how we write concurrent code in that language. I just upgraded a less important service to Java 27, a few days after its release (several nice features). It's cool how easy it is to upgrade nowadays. That an agent writes most of the code doesn't mean anything to me here. My examples are Java because that is the main language where I work.

karmakurtisaani 7d ago
Thanks for the perspective.
- frje1400 7d ago
  You're welcome. I now feel inspired to try to change your mind, if you don't mind. I would argue that "concepts" actually are more important than ever. Let's take my structured concurrency example. It doesn't matter here exactly what is, but if it ends up being as important as I think it will be, I likely want to write most concurrent code that way going forward. However, it will likely be years until agents go to it unless deliberately steered in that direction. And if I want to make agents write it, I need to review it, and if I'm going to review, I need to understand it. I think this is why I'm not pessimistic about the profession, it still feels like what I'm doing and learning matters.
  - slopinthebag 6d ago
    just chiming in to say that i agree with you. i initially felt demotivated and passionless but the more i use llms to generate code the more i feel like knowledge of the concepts are crucial to generating useful code. eg. you dont need to memorise sorting algorithms or be able to write them, but you do need to understand the concept of sorting, and the concept of time complexity, etc etc. knowing what data structures to use and when to use them. knowing how to structure concurrency for your problem space. many many concepts. system design is becoming the most important thing, and to me it's also the most interesting part of creating software. and there will always be more to know.

za3faran 7d ago

There's a couple of languages I follow their roadmap and I find exciting, including Java and C#. I don't feel there's proper justification of writing backend services in something like python or ruby anymore, for example.

karmakurtisaani 7d ago
Yeah, I also try to follow what's new. But it's more like "Ok, that's good I guess." Rather than "Cool! Looking forward to applying this in my next project!"
pjmlp 7d ago
Never was really, at least if performance matters.
NetMageSCW 7d ago
I found C# exciting when it was new and adding features that were important to me, but now it feels like it has become bogged down with chunks just abandoned on the alter of backwards compatibility (Expression, anyone?) and adding features I couldn’t care less about (null safe code, pattern matching, etc).
- Quothling 6d ago
  I worked with C# for a decade around the transition from .net to .net core to .net. I've come to really dislike it as a language because of it's implicity and abstractions but I'm surprised that you're not finding the new features intereting. All the work on immutability seems pretty awesome to me at least. Sure it's still this bastard version where you build "readonly" objects and put them into immutable collections, but I assume they'll work on this going forward. I'm never going back to it, but I do think it's the best it's ever been.