3 ms·
You would have a heck of a job convincing a court that 60% domestic market share in a two competitor market constitutes a monopoly.
by bunderbunder 7d ago
You would have a heck of a job convincing a court that 60% domestic market share in a two competitor market constitutes a monopoly.
- mahboi 7d agoThen how is Google a monopoly at 40%?
- LocalH 7d agoThat’s not the metric under which Google is seen as a monopoly, and you know it. It’s search. And ads.
- mahboi 6d agoNo I don't know it. Is that what echelon meant when saying Google needs to be broken up?
- bunderbunder 7d agoIt isn’t, and nobody said it is. The ruling in question did not find that Google had a mobile OS monopoly. It found that they had monopolies in both the ad server and ad exchange markets, and was using them to reinforce each other in an anticompetitive way.
- izacus 6d agoSo why would they breakup Android away from Google (essentially killing the product as a whole due to lack of funding from Play) instead of separating the Ad business?
- deleted 7d ago[deleted]