2 ms·
> But the open source project wouldn’t need to invest as much as Google does. Not at first. Yet over time the work increases as one must differ more and more f
by paulryanrogers 16d ago
> But the open source project wouldn’t need to invest as much as Google does.
Not at first. Yet over time the work increases as one must differ more and more from Chrome. I believe that's why so many forks are giving up on Manifest V2.
- Forgeties79 16d agoDifferentiating isn’t as important as not engaging in Google‘s heinous practices
- charcircuit 16d agoForks are giving up on mv2 because it's not as important as the people online say it is. If mv2 was what would cause a browser to gain market share they would keep maintaining it, but if the market is not rewarding browsers with mv2 then it does not make sense to maintain.
- armadyl 16d agoSeriously. The average person in real life has no idea what MV2 or MV3 is. And despite what people here would have you believe uBlock Origin Lite works nearly as good as uBO and is generally indistinguishable from its MV2 counterpart. A casual user wold not be able to tell the difference, nor do they care.
- nottorp 15d agoIndistinguishable because ad blocking still works at the visible end of the spectrum. Under the hood, what the MV2 uBlock can do and Lite can't is at the least stripping tracking parameters from links and block 3rd party trackers that are cloaked in a subdomain of the originating site.
- Forgeties79 15d agoYou’re right it doesn’t impact most people’s decisions but m2 and m3’s differences are quite substantial and meaningful.
- Forgeties79 15d agoThat’s overly simplistic and glosses over the actual objections to mv3.