2 ms·

The phrasing of your first question is ironic given GrapheneOS has upstreamed a ton of their security hardening. You're probably asking if they're able contrib

by nzeid 8d ago

The phrasing of your first question is ironic given GrapheneOS has upstreamed a ton of their security hardening. You're probably asking if they're able contribute anymore?

izacus 8d ago
Can you link to patches or commits they upstteamed? I'm not aware Google ever accepted any.
- PhilippGille 8d ago
  https://grapheneos.org/faq#upstream https://grapheneos.org/faq#upstream https://android-review.googlesource.com/q/status:merged+author:%22Daniel%20Micay%22 https://android-review.googlesource.com/q/status:merged+auth...
  - HJain13 7d ago
    Nothing in last 5 years; and if we ignore the last one, Nothing in almost 9-10 years. I am not sure how much weight it holds. Now if that's on Google on not accepting stuff that's different matter
    - izacus 7d ago
      Most of it is one liner config changes too, not much of actual code.
    - ysnp 7d ago
      What about issue tracker discussions, mailing list discussions, security vulnerability reports etc.?
shwaj 7d ago
Why is it ironic? Sounds like an honest question from someone who doesn’t know.
- nzeid 6d ago
  Don't worry, I'm not coming down hard on said person. The thread is about a GrapheneOS bulletin, whose members are well-documented contributers to AOSP.