2 ms·

Oklahoma hasn't threatened to nuke anyone.....yet.

• QuercusMax 8d ago
  But they did bomb their own people in the Tulsa Race Massacre
  • kfkdmdndndn 8d ago
    [flagged]
    • phoghed 8d ago
      fresh account just for this bitchmade comment lmao. close call, I almost engaged with it earnestly
      • QuercusMax 8d ago
        Lol, also the only use of nuclear weapons in war was over 80 years ago, so I'm not sure what their point even is aside from being a moronic racist
  • nkingsy 8d ago
    nono the state is the only thing that counts. Not the country the state is in or the cities in the state.
• throe844949 8d ago
  Oklahoma is part of US, and there were several threats! Just a few months ago against Iran!
• tecleandor 8d ago
  Not Oklahoma but Trump has made nuclear threats from Maryland this summer...
• NikolaNovak 8d ago
  (Not to be contrarian, but I rather thought usa has recently and repeatedly threatened to bomb and nuke countries into stone age... And in fact went significant way through that effort over last few months, to the tune of some $40bil or so, for no clear, consistent, rational, elucidated reason whatsoever. And of course, rather famously, is the only country that actually deployed nuclear weapons against other people). I don't necessarily disagree with your underlying point mind you, but USA isn't what it used to be internationally, if it ever truly was. "Oklahoma / USA are peaceful, predictable. rational political entities" is a rather laughable point to try to make today :-/
• mathgeek 8d ago
  Technically, Oklahoma is on the short list of locations that _have_ detonated a nuclear bomb on their enemies in wartime.
• killingtime74 7d ago
  Isn't the US literally the only country to ever use a nuke against humans?