2 ms·
Sure, the engines may have died, but not only is the plane still airborne, it's even accelerating!
by slg 15d ago
Sure, the engines may have died, but not only is the plane still airborne, it's even accelerating!
- verdverm 15d agogravity... is working against me... dream of ways... to throw it all away... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBex8zbDRs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7VBex8zbDRs
- samudrijan 15d agoView looks great from up here. Any peanuts?
- jackb4040 15d agoI could kiss you!
- tialaramex 15d agoTo be fair, while accelerating isn't necessarily what you want per se, you must maintain airspeed in an aeroplane if it loses engines. The instinct is to preserve altitude since hitting the ground is the key thing you don't want to happen - but if you preserve that altitude at the cost of losing airspeed (and now that you don't have engines you can't keep both) you will experience aerodynamic stall and fall out of the sky anyway.
- cmurf 15d agoThere are two best glide airspeeds for this scenario: lowest descent rate (typically not published) and greatest range. Simplistically, the published airspeed number will get you pretty close to the best lift/drag ratio for make/model. This should be a memory number. As for the landing, perhaps the best advise I read was from Bob Hoover (aerobatics in a twin Aero Commander): If you’re faced with a forced landing, fly the thing as far into the crash as possible. The key word: fly. You are not flying if you are stalling. And you only have positive control if you're flying. Or also: don't stop too abruptly.