6 ms·
I used Google Reader for years and years as a central repository for all of the webcomics i read. I switched to Newsblur this year and haven't looked back. It
by knowtheory 14y ago
I used Google Reader for years and years as a central repository for all of the webcomics i read.
I switched to Newsblur this year and haven't looked back. It definitely has a better take on sharing.
- wslh 14y agoBut Google Reader has historical records that no other service has. That is the main advantage with them.
- ersii 14y agoThey do? I've noticed that Google Reader only seems to keep about 30 to 60 days worth of items - at least for me. The only thing that I can think of, in terms of historical records, in the UI - is the 'how often is this feed updated?' graph under feed information. I disagree with you, their main advantage is that they're Google. So they won't get shunned/blocked by webmasters. Other people/services can and do get blocked occationally. Other advantages are; GReader is pretty easy to get going with (I already had a Google account), the UI isn't too much in the way and the fact that they're "always on" (but the last one is true for all 'webapps'/'web services') so they won't miss a update from a feed.
- jfb 14y agoThe main advantage of Reader is that third party clients sync with it.
- conesus 14y agoGlad somebody mentioned NewsBlur. I run NewsBlur and have been aggressive in developing it into a world-class feed reader. Native iOS and Android apps, a nice shared stories feature, and it's actively developed. See for yourself, since it's open-source: http://github.com/samuelclay http://github.com/samuelclay. And because I run my own feed fetchers, you don't have to worry about the inevitable sunsetting and neglect of Reader. Also means I can do far more interesting things to feeds and stories that other Google Reader API-based clients can't. Try it out: http://www.newsblur.com http://www.newsblur.com
- rb2k_ 14y agoReally nice interface. And what might be interesting for some: The hosted version has 60 feeds in the free version, for more than that you'll have to upgrade to a premium account.
- taylorlapeyre 14y agoJust got a premium account. Awesome service, and it's great to know that it's being actively developed. Side note: I love the vim keyboard shortcuts.
- mehmeta 14y agoJust curious, how come your premium to free user ratio is 1:2? Seems incredibly high to me.
- smsm42 14y agoInteresting interface. With my almost 500 feeds, not sure yet if I'd like to use paid version, since Google one is free, but I'll take it for a test drive. Some feedback: - "Original" button definitely didn't do what I expected. It just closed everything and took me to the target site. Maybe it's just for some "unframeable" sites but that's how it worked. - "Keep unread" and "Mark as unread" definitely missing. Sometimes after I start reading it turns out the item needs more time than I have now and I want to get back to it later. Not the same as "Save" which means I definitely want to keep it - here I just don't know yet. - Clicking on triangle and gear in the feed display seems to do the same thing? Why there are two of them then? - In feed stats for some sites, it says: "IF YOU WENT PREMIUM, THIS SITE WOULD UPDATE EVERY". That's it, nothing after that. - Something weird going on with stories display - folder with no unread content shows yellow "27" and clicking on folder that shows no content at all opens set of stories that seem to be unread stories from elsewhere.