4 ms·
It can go either way, you might get a relief of pressure or you might get an increased destabilisation in the region.
by andy_ppp 15d ago
It can go either way, you might get a relief of pressure or you might get an increased destabilisation in the region.
- skeptic_ai 15d agoThere isA study about fire fighting. If you shit down every fire quickly then eventually you’ll have a major black swan. If you let fires burn a bit more then you’ll avoid black swan effect that burns down everything
- dataflow 15d agoHave you considered logarithms?
- ImJamal 15d agoAre fires and earthquakes the same?
- RugnirViking 15d agoit would appear nobody here knows. We probably ought to shut up until a seismologist decides to chime in
- monster_truck 15d agoWhat would a size scientist know about fires or earthquakes anyways
- InsideOutSanta 15d agoThey'd know how big they are, obviously.
- cindyllm 15d ago[dead]
- taneq 15d agoI’m not sure if “let fires burn a bit more” is exactly what we’re after but hazard reduction burns are absolutely a thing and are an essential part of fire risk management. I don’t think your post deserved to get slammed like that. The region can build up resistance to big fires by having small fires.
- skeptic_ai 14d agoYeah that’s what I’m talking about
- wyan 14d agoBy definition, a black swan event cannot be predicted. It doesn't just mean "a larger fire" or "the event of a lifetime".