He's right about the fixing versus managing. Although for sanity's sake you really should think of it as permanent lifestyle changes, not "management." And al

He's right about the fixing versus managing. Although for sanity's sake you really should think of it as permanent lifestyle changes, not "management." And also you should try to optimize for overall health with your lifestyle changes, not weight loss (which comes with improved health anyway). One place this approach falls down is that it doesn't distinguish the effects of various types of calories. Just pursuing "variety" isn't going to cut it. You can eat a ton of fiber (with high caloric content) but you'll actually absorb very little of it. If you eat a ton of sugar you'll crash your metabolism, your insulin will skyrocket, and you'll put on pounds even if you started out burning more than you consume (plus you may induce diabetes). Really, a hacker approach will acknowledge that what you're really trying to reduce is fat, not weight alone (is anyone here trying to lose muscle?) And calories input do not go directly to fat. There is a sophisticated set of hormone feedback systems that govern whether fat is stored or broken down for energy, and until you hack your hormone system you may well be chasing your tail.