3 ms·
I thought this was already allowed and the norm for many years?
by majorchord 15d ago
I thought this was already allowed and the norm for many years?
- mingus88 15d agoYou are right. What most people don’t understand however is that “the border” extends for 100 miles https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone This effectively means border patrol can do whatever they want in areas that do not involve a border crossing and involve citizens just living their normal lives
- realo 15d agoThat concerns more than 220 million people in the USA, who can be arbitrarily stopped in the street and searched. Be afraid...
- weaksauce 15d ago...which is about 2/3rds the population of america.
- Arubis 15d agoNote also that that 100 miles _is a radius around your nearest international airport_ and need not be what you think of as a border, i.e. a line drawn between two land masses.
- iamnothere 15d agoThis is not correct, it’s a common but false misunderstanding. The text of the law does not support this and the ACLU/EFF don’t see it as a likely problem. People should stop repeating this claim or it will become one of those “folk truths” that eventually becomes accepted and real.
- Arubis 15d agoYou are correct; I was wrong on this one! I’d read it so many times and far enough back, coupled with DHS’s general attitude of “we’ll do what we want”, that I’d taken it as true. Delighted not to be right here.
- iamnothere 15d agoOf course, as it is, the 100 mile zone is already absurd enough!
- majorchord 15d agoPlease cite a reputable source for this claim. Preferably a SCOTUS ruling.