> which shows the "near-lossless" claim should be taken with a grain of salt I agree. I don’t know how they get such good results on these benchmarks because u

> which shows the "near-lossless" claim should be taken with a grain of salt I agree. I don’t know how they get such good results on these benchmarks because using them gives a very different experience. They’re kind of cool for doing short free form outputs in memory constrained systems, but I don’t think they’re useful as coding agents.