So you don't think it is possible to have an opinion on a project you maintain and be objectively wrong in that opinion[1]? For instance, the GNOME3 guys and t

So you don't think it is possible to have an opinion on a project you maintain and be objectively wrong in that opinion[1]? For instance, the GNOME3 guys and the design direction they are taking. No matter what, they can't be "wrong" (whatever that means in this case) in that opinion? I get that objective right/wrong can get complex and murky rather rapidly, though I feel with experience people can actually make judgement calls on these. And in this case, checking in binary assets is wrong, from experience. It causes many more problems that it solves. So, DHH is "wrong" in this instance even if he himself feels that it is the way to go. [1] - "wrong" might have been an improper word to use, though for the sake of consistency, I'm going to continue ;)