What I’m seeing is more developers pushing more code of dubious quality without the ability to respond to feedback on said code. You can have the best security

What I’m seeing is more developers pushing more code of dubious quality without the ability to respond to feedback on said code. You can have the best security review in the world, but if the author of the code is not equipped to understand the feedback it ends up being a moot point. The challenge to me seems less technical and more cultural: how do we keep ourselves intellectually honest and engaged when we now spend the majority of our time orchestrating agents and outsourcing the design and thought processes?