2 ms·
> No way. Mathematicians don't assume things to be true even if there are no counterexamples. It depends: there do exist some conjectures for which there don't
by aleph_minus_one 8d ago
> No way. Mathematicians don't assume things to be true even if there are no counterexamples.
It depends: there do exist some conjectures for which there don't exist any proofs, but a huge amount of results assuming this conjecture (which is very near to assuming that the conjecture is true). Examples are:
- Riemann hypothesis [1]
- Generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH) [2], and potentially also Extended Riemann hypothesis (ERH) [3]
- Standard conjectures on algebraic cycles [4]
- perhaps Schanuel’s conjecture [5]
--
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riemann_hypothesis&oldid=1375292396 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Riemann_hypothesi...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generalized_Riemann_hypothesis&oldid=1370923804#Generalized_Riemann_hypothesis_(GRH) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generalized_Riema...
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generalized_Riemann_hypothesis&oldid=1370923804#Extended_Riemann_hypothesis_(ERH) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Generalized_Riema...
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Standard_conjectures_on_algebraic_cycles&oldid=1374346010 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Standard_conjectu...
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schanuel%27s_conjecture&oldid=1375037872 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Schanuel%27s_conj...