3 ms·
They learned nothing from the Grok Code saga. If anything, that should have been a learning lesson to NOT trust harnesses, especially new ones.
by denysvitali 18d ago
They learned nothing from the Grok Code saga.
If anything, that should have been a learning lesson to NOT trust harnesses, especially new ones.
- throwa356262 17d agoHold on, what happened with grok?
- jhealy 17d agohttps://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/07/14/musk-promises-purge-after-grok-build-caught-sending-entire-repos-to-the-cloud/5271123 https://www.theregister.com/ai-and-ml/2026/07/14/musk-promis...
- numpad0 17d ago[delayed]
- zahlman 17d agoThe basic premise of the LLM companies marketing their "agents" honestly reads to me like: "Yes, we know our commercial, proprietary software has a C2 server[0] embedded. That's by design and it's what lets us deliver all the value, pinky promise. Besides, it's not us remotely operating your computer; it's a massive, more-or-less autonomous computer program that we don't really understand, running on hardware you could barely even dream of." If people weren't already familiar with the idea of LLMs existing and being able to write usable code and make "tool calls", this would sound completely and utterly batshit insane. Because it pretty much is. [0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet#Command_and_control https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Botnet#Command_and_control