>I'd load it up with all the "semantic web" style things I could find. http://schema.org http://schema.org type of stuff. Why though? I think the manual "seman

>I'd load it up with all the "semantic web" style things I could find. http://schema.org http://schema.org type of stuff. Why though? I think the manual "semantic web markup" is a failed promise, more than anything. The idea was flawed from the start for general web use (for one, you cannot trust content providers to add relevant semantic info, either because it's in their interest NOT to do so --e.g SEO spam--, or because they are not competent or lazy). Plus, the tools never materialised. It's another case of "worse is better".