3 ms·
I'm always fuzzy on this, so 116% faster or 16% faster? The benchmarks suggest 16%.
by webprofusion 17d ago
I'm always fuzzy on this, so 116% faster or 16% faster? The benchmarks suggest 16%.
- levkk 17d ago116% would be 2x which will break the laws of physics. 16% is possible if you're not allocating heap memory, which I believe is the main selling point here.
- tom_ 17d agoEvergreen: https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/what-we-talk-about-when-we-talk-about-performance/ https://randomascii.wordpress.com/2018/02/04/what-we-talk-ab... (Feels like it should probably say "1.16x as fast" or "1.16x the throughput" - or something like that.)