4 ms·

You know exactly what they mean. But if somehow you miraculously don't there are hundreds of stories like this: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/lawyer

• williamcotton 8d ago
  Aren’t hallucinations different than slop? So no, I don’t know what they mean.
  • samtp 8d ago
    hallucinations are a subset of slop
    • williamcotton 8d ago
      So is there other “lawslop” or is it just hallucinations in this context?
      • samtp 8d ago
        You must have a greater critical thinking ability than what you are showing now.
        • williamcotton 8d ago
          Why be so unkind?
          • samtp 8d ago
            Apologies for the candor but you're being willfully obtuse.
            • williamcotton 8d ago
              I’m honestly looking for an actual example of something other than hallucinations! There are no examples in this entire thread! It’s just cynicism.
              • samtp 8d ago
                I mean this is the first google result for AI law slop and it's not citing a hallucination: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/appeals-court-warns-about-ai-slop-filings-weighs-punishing-lawyer-2026-09-17/ https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/appeals-court-warns... It's everywhere and not hard to find if you make even the most modest effort.
                • williamcotton 8d ago
                  Ok, so, “gibberish” in this case? Honestly, this word has lost all meaning, outside of perhaps “any use of AI”. Well at least I know where team “lawslop” is coming from. Thanks, I guess?
                  • samtp 8d ago
                    Like I said before, you're being willfully dense in the context of this conversation.