Yes, I'd expect a 2 year old preprint from a rising research in this utlra-niche field to likely be discussed when someone is claiming to have a sweeping soluti

Yes, I'd expect a 2 year old preprint from a rising research in this utlra-niche field to likely be discussed when someone is claiming to have a sweeping solution on exactly the same research question Maybe not necessarily so, but while looking through the paper's bibliography I get the sense that these were AI-gathered references because there seems to be gaps in the current literature on this topic