3 ms·
The Times is a US magazine. The odds of them picking a US unit of measurement are very high.
by t-writescode 17d ago
The Times is a US magazine. The odds of them picking a US unit of measurement are very high.
- verelo 17d agoThe same newspaper uses Celsius in its climate reporting, including the article below. Apparently the units depend on which extinction we’re discussing. One extra letter would save the guesswork. https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/02/climate/united-nations-climate-target-overshoot.html https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/02/climate/united-nations-cl... Edit: Removed the headline quotation because the search listing and article heading differ.
- t-writescode 17d agoThis makes sense from a context and writer perspective. Most conversation about climate change has been around global average temps raising in C. Further, switching that back and forth and doubling it for F would be seen as manipulative by people that don’t want to hear it. On the contrary, the Times’s US audience (probably their main audience) thinks of body temp, which this is, in F. To add further, the audience and writers that want to share cool, new dinosaur fact and the group that does an update on global warming are different people and operate and think differently around these specific things in these specific contexts. Of course it would be easier to add the letter, but I can definitely see why it wasn’t included.
- verelo 17d agoThat’s a reasonable explanation for choosing Fahrenheit. It’s also a pretty good explanation for choosing to label it, since the same paper uses both scales.
- t-writescode 17d agoIndeed. It also turns out, as someone else in this thread has noted, NYT's style guides say to not include the unit in headlines, so here we are :)
- deleted 17d ago[deleted]