2 ms·
> That can be said for both directions Huh? In what way? My desire to avoid being spied on does not impinge on anyone else's privacy. > What really seems to b
by JohnFen 17d ago
> That can be said for both directions
Huh? In what way? My desire to avoid being spied on does not impinge on anyone else's privacy.
> What really seems to be happening is people extrapolating a few bad apples into the default.
That's not my position. My position is that these devices expose me to a larger corporate/governmental (you can't really separate the two) surveillance system. The person actually wearing the devices isn't really my main point of concern.
> There's nothing illegal about that.
I'm not talking about what's legal. I'm talking about what's acceptable and right.
- verdverm 17d ago> Huh? In what way? I was referring to phone vs glasses > My position is that these devices expose me to a larger corporate/governmental (you can't really separate the two) surveillance system. How do smart glasses change things from the phone you and everyone else (I assume) carry with us wherever us go? > I'm talking about what's acceptable and right. If you make public photography illegal, you also make illegal the capturing of things that are not acceptable or right. Remember when ICE murdered Alex Pretti and Renee Good.