3 ms·

No, it doesn't. The baby boomers represented an actual demographic change, that's why they're tracked by the Census Bureau. Everything since then is marketing a

No, it doesn't. The baby boomers represented an actual demographic change, that's why they're tracked by the Census Bureau. Everything since then is marketing and astrology.

AIiscoming 15d ago
you are just nitpicking. People get used to understand what generation 'name' they got from society, thinktanks and co and its not that hard to know what the younger generations are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#List_of_social_generations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#List_of_social_gene... Astrology is just garbage.
- breezybottom 15d ago
  It's the same, you're just substituting years for months.
  - AIiscoming 15d ago
    The name of the generation gives you birth years. It also tells you "hey the generation 2010-2020 are getting hit by AI a lot more than the previous ones. This not astrology at all. Astrology is 'magic thinking'.
  - harimau777 15d ago
    The difference is that named generations don't claim that any differences are due to supernatural influence. Instead they are arguing that the differing circumstances in which people grow up and live influences their experiences and how they see the world. That is a MUCH more defensible position.
    - breezybottom 15d ago
      It would be defensible if it worked that way. Instead they work backwards: define the groups for marketing purposes, and then try to identify the similarities.
      - harimau777 15d ago
        That's irrelevant to what I wrote. Whether it was made up by marketers or anyone else doesn't change the fact that unlike astrology it doesn't make an appeal to magic.
- dgellow 15d ago
  Named generations are a marketing tool, it’s a concept as garbage as astrology
  - AIiscoming 15d ago
    Its a name for a generation a decade wide. I really don't get your hate for it?!
hn_throwaway_99 15d ago
BS. While I agree the cutoffs are arbitrary, marking a cohort by, say, "people who graduated highschool before the advent of smart phones" or "people who went through childhood in the early years of social media" are valid groupings. As a Gen Xer my childhood was soooo different from what kids today experience. And literally every single Gen Xer I know is glad and feels relief (sometimes mixed in with remorse) that our childhood was before the consumer Internet took off.
- dgellow 15d ago
  If you want these cohorts to have statistical significance you have to add more details, such as the geographic location, language, etc. But you can create cohorts with pretty much anything, in itself that doesn’t validate the concept of generations as pitched by marketing agencies
  - harimau777 15d ago
    Luckily for us, the cohorts don't need to have statistical significance because people aren't talking about statistics. They are talking about the broad shared experiences of most people born in a given range of years.

No, it doesn't. The baby boomers represented an actual demographic change, that's why they're tracked by the Census Bureau. Everything since then is marketing and astrology.

AIiscoming 15d ago

you are just nitpicking. People get used to understand what generation 'name' they got from society, thinktanks and co and its not that hard to know what the younger generations are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#List_of_social_generations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation#List_of_social_gene... Astrology is just garbage.

breezybottom 15d ago
It's the same, you're just substituting years for months.
- AIiscoming 15d ago
  The name of the generation gives you birth years. It also tells you "hey the generation 2010-2020 are getting hit by AI a lot more than the previous ones. This not astrology at all. Astrology is 'magic thinking'.
- harimau777 15d ago
  The difference is that named generations don't claim that any differences are due to supernatural influence. Instead they are arguing that the differing circumstances in which people grow up and live influences their experiences and how they see the world. That is a MUCH more defensible position.
  - breezybottom 15d ago
    It would be defensible if it worked that way. Instead they work backwards: define the groups for marketing purposes, and then try to identify the similarities.
    - harimau777 15d ago
      That's irrelevant to what I wrote. Whether it was made up by marketers or anyone else doesn't change the fact that unlike astrology it doesn't make an appeal to magic.
dgellow 15d ago
Named generations are a marketing tool, it’s a concept as garbage as astrology
- AIiscoming 15d ago
  Its a name for a generation a decade wide. I really don't get your hate for it?!

hn_throwaway_99 15d ago

BS. While I agree the cutoffs are arbitrary, marking a cohort by, say, "people who graduated highschool before the advent of smart phones" or "people who went through childhood in the early years of social media" are valid groupings. As a Gen Xer my childhood was soooo different from what kids today experience. And literally every single Gen Xer I know is glad and feels relief (sometimes mixed in with remorse) that our childhood was before the consumer Internet took off.

dgellow 15d ago
If you want these cohorts to have statistical significance you have to add more details, such as the geographic location, language, etc. But you can create cohorts with pretty much anything, in itself that doesn’t validate the concept of generations as pitched by marketing agencies
- harimau777 15d ago
  Luckily for us, the cohorts don't need to have statistical significance because people aren't talking about statistics. They are talking about the broad shared experiences of most people born in a given range of years.