> Sharing the government propaganda site’s link as a source has to be the joke of the year. Since the article is essentially a collection of quotes, each of wh

> Sharing the government propaganda site’s link as a source has to be the joke of the year. Since the article is essentially a collection of quotes, each of which is easily verifiable by following links, you'll have to be a little more specific about the "joke". > I’ve shared no misinformation on Germany, besides the hard cold truth. Only suicidally empathetic leftists like yourself would find that to be misinformation. You literally keep claiming variations of "nobody talked about this/that topic!", but in each instance I can attest that you're completely wrong. My own views have nothing to do with the fact that public discussions did happen. I'm sure you'll bring up some arbitrary threshold to justify yourself, but your comments are misrepresentations, and your attack makes it seem very much deliberate. > There was no debate on surrogacy after he resigned[...] I don't know what to tell you, but there was - anyone can easily look up the online discussions, and the many news articles covering the public debate. > it was as if surrogacy was used as a tool and then discarded when it doesn’t benefits the lefties See, this is where your bias becomes undeniable: 1. The majority of complaints about Spahn's bigotry did not come from leftists. Why aren't you mentioning how his own voters complained far more? 2. You're assuming that leftists should behave according to your cartoonish understanding of their views. Being "pro-women’s rights and equality" does not logically imply that one should advocate for surrogacy, unless you presuppose that your subjective views on surrogacy are objectively correct. But since you've already branded me as a "suicidally empathetic leftists", I won't waste more effort explaining this - it's trivial to find discussions and philosophical texts on all this.