4 ms·
Because the only two blue states that matter, California and New York, would immediately be the richest members of the EU. And the EU is already way too top hea
by petcat 16d ago
Because the only two blue states that matter, California and New York, would immediately be the richest members of the EU. And the EU is already way too top heavy. Why would those two states allow themselves to be subject to equal voting power of a bunch of Eastern European micronations? Not to mention that neither of those states is going to be interested in allowing free movement and immigration from Europe. It would be a bonanza.
It would be a wildly lopsided relationship. The EU would get more from those two states than those two states would ever recoup from the EU.
- flowerlad 16d agoBlue citizens will be able to move freely to EU and live and work there without special visas. Worth it. Also worth it for silicon valley tech companies who will be able to hire the best of EU as well.
- petcat 16d agoThat is a microscopic number of people compared to the ones that will not want Europeans freely moving to California or New York. And SV companies have never had any problem hiring the best people in the EU. That brain drain has been happening for decades.
- greggoB 16d agoI'd imagine they'd find it interesting for the same reason that the US finds its membership in NAFTA/USMCA and NATO interesting, despite being significantly larger: market access and strength in numbers. > It would be a wildly lopsided relationship. The EU would get more from those two states than those two states would ever recoup from the EU. I seem to remember very similar arguments doing the rounds circa Brexit. Funny how that turned out. To be clear, I'm not saying that EU membership necessarily is interesting for NY and CA. It clearly wasn't particularly interesting for Canada before now, but here we are.