I would guess that a dislike for reduce overlaps with a preference with imperative languages. Filter and map are easy because you can make more assertions abou

I would guess that a dislike for reduce overlaps with a preference with imperative languages. Filter and map are easy because you can make more assertions about them without inspection: - they take a list-like as input - they take a function as input - they return a list-like as output As opposed to reduce: - it takes a list-like as input - it takes a function as input The output type is not fixed, and its behavior is not fixed. If you pass the right function, reduce is filter, or map, or something else we've never seen.