It's a known problem, for which we've also had a pretty robust workaround since Montesquieu : distribute separate part of power to _many_ craving people who dis

It's a known problem, for which we've also had a pretty robust workaround since Montesquieu : distribute separate part of power to _many_ craving people who disagree and can lock each other's. I'm all for adding a branch that would be primarily picked at random (and I'm all for having a branch that is only recruited among peers of expertise, with fréquent rotation as a way to limit the risk of connivence, etc...)