I don't think I'm detached from what a normal user uses, because I don't expect that list to be representative of anyone but me. For a regular user, macOS can

I don't think I'm detached from what a normal user uses, because I don't expect that list to be representative of anyone but me. For a regular user, macOS can be very practical and non-obtrusive OS, yet for me, it's not as useful as a Linux system with KDE installed. Currently I'm writing this comment from my KDE system, and I see more clearly why I prefer to use it much more. Because it allows me to have much more screen real estate with much faster multi-desktop management capabilities to begin with. However, my point still stands. In short, KDE provides the features I use daily (esp. in the file management department) in a much more capable and integrated manner than macOS out of the box. I have to think about which tools I need to get to handle something on macOS, and on KDE, the tools are always integrated to the tool I already holding. My work just flows on KDE, yet on macOS I need to setup something before being able to flow. Ripping audio CDs without even thinking is a bonus.