3 ms·
But man this is ridiculous. 25 field medalists don’t accept agency in their own community but try to push external people to change their process?? Why can’t t
by simianwords 15d ago
But man this is ridiculous. 25 field medalists don’t accept agency in their own community but try to push external people to change their process??
Why can’t the letter say “guys new tech dropped. We need to reorganise. Understanding is crucial” instead of asking OpenAI to change their process.
- NonHyloMorph 14d agoMight have to do with the circumstances of Open AIs conduct that was quite sketchy to say the least? There is 25 people who see it as their responsibility to use their status in the field of maths to weigh in on public discourse regarding that field.
- ChickeNES 14d ago> Might have to do with the circumstances of Open AIs conduct that was quite sketchy to say the least? OpenAI did nothing wrong, being a Fields medalist does not give anyone a monopoly on the truth.
- jambalaya8 14d agoreceiving a prize for math or any other discipline doesn't even mean the person was right or truthful. just sayin'.
- varjag 14d agoFields medalists aren't made on some Fields factory. These are 25 people from different backgrounds, generations, educational institutions and countries. It's kind of incredible you guys think they decided to collude against OpenAI rather than simply addressing a concern about their field they believe is important.
- jambalaya8 14d agoI am aware of this. As I am aware they at times decide not to give anyone one... shrug. Mathematicians were somewhat wiser in the 1960s but the biologists and social sciences never were.
- ChickeNES 14d agoNever said they were colluding. I said I have no patience for incumbents asking for restrictions on a technology that threatens the value of their expertise.
- GPerson 13d agoThat’s because you have literally no idea about anything you’re weighing in on.
- GPerson 13d agoThis is just fucking absurd.