> Is it because people think the topic is interesting but don't actually care about the content? I'm having difficulty seeing where you draw the line between “

> Is it because people think the topic is interesting but don't actually care about the content? I'm having difficulty seeing where you draw the line between “topic” and “content”. I found the article interesting as it taught me a few things that I didn't already know. I did notice the one egregious AIism that you pointed out, but the rest was readable and informative. (Although I stopped at the point where it started talking about their software Fink.)