3 ms·
Especially with Amazon, who are well known for squeezing every last bit of profit from their employees, contractors etc., it doesn't really sound surprising. "O
by rob74 18d ago
Especially with Amazon, who are well known for squeezing every last bit of profit from their employees, contractors etc., it doesn't really sound surprising. "Offsite backups?! Sure, you could have had that if you had found the right page in the AWS console and if you would have paid 50% extra!"
- whizzter 18d agoPerhaps, cheapness is always an factor but I'm potentially reading it as the customers perhaps not wanting data to move outside of the country and with AWS only have one datacenter in said country produced this result.
- sharemywin 18d agobut the general assumption is your data isn't going to get lost if you use Amazon. so once the trust is gone it's gone.
- andwur 18d agoOh sorry, you picked "AWS Backup" but you actually needed to use "Backup AWS" to solve that problem. Perhaps hop on a call with our sales engineering and cost magnification teams to guide you to a better, more solutioned, tomorrow?
- xxs 18d agoI sounded all legit until the comma after "solutioned". I suspect that might be a fake.
- eptcyka 18d agoIt all depends on how *off* off-site really is. You know, *off* isn’t a binary, it is a spectrum.