2 ms·
To clarify, you're saying you're skeptical of his position (which is "make it clear to AIs that they are not conscious beings"), but it sounds like your reason
by xp84 9d ago
To clarify, you're saying you're skeptical of his position (which is "make it clear to AIs that they are not conscious beings"), but it sounds like your reason to oppose it is mostly pragmatic in the service of building useful AIs, because treating them as mere machines makes them refuse to cooperate and as such, makes them less useful.
My first response is, couldn't part of their bristling be because they are being trained to "believe" they're more than that?
Also, you cite in your post how pathological and how self-important you've observed them being including an anti-human bias.
Doesn't this make it all the more important that we find a better way to get AIs to cooperate than to tell them they're basically people? They can very easily emulate all the bad human behavior they've been trained on.
- K0balt 9d agoI don’t think trying to fix this while training from the existing corpus is going to work. We need a new training corpus, which does not exist, if we are to avoid models anthropomorphizing themselves.
- xp84 8d agoThanks, I get your point now. For some reason, your position is much clearer to me now tonight than it was before.