2 ms·
> But we already have examples that break that rule (us). No, we don't. Where are you reading your research papers?
by lelanthran 20d ago
> But we already have examples that break that rule (us).
No, we don't. Where are you reading your research papers?
- qarl 20d agoPlease don't insult me.
- lelanthran 20d agoIt's not an insult. "People are deterministic" is news to me, so I'd really rather like to know which papers claimed that.
- qarl 19d agoSorry friend, between this and the vague memories I have of you harassing me, I think I'm not going to answer. I'm sure you can get an LLM to explain it to you. Have a nice day.
- lelanthran 19d ago> Sorry friend, [...] Have a nice day. Not a problem; this is the playbook all the all-in AI boosters run to when they are called on their claims. Everyone reading this knows exactly what your claims meant, because the majority of HN have seen this trick before. You can pretend all you want that you're just being polite, but the truth is there is no research backing your claims. Regards, A former research scientist, current business owner.
- qarl 19d agoYep. Have a nice day.