> Are you trying to say that the AfP program and the F14 sale were the attempts to try? You realize those were done prior to the Islamic revolution, right? What

> Are you trying to say that the AfP program and the F14 sale were the attempts to try? You realize those were done prior to the Islamic revolution, right? What attempts outside of the JCPOA have been tried during the rule of the current government? > You might want to do some basic research before you speak on a topic. The shah was overthrown in 79. After Atoms for Peace, after the F14s were delivered (79 of 80, the last not delivered because of the revolution). What happened in 1953? I'd encourage you to develop an understanding of the timeline of events before commenting further. > They did when they committed to the JCPOA. Then the US backed out. Perfidy, same as the negotiations during this war. That's partly because Iran was arguably not adhering to the JCPOA and even so they were still killing people in the region and undertaking other nefarious actions which called in to question adherence to the JCPOA. But all of that is pointless because we shouldn't have to have a special snowflake agreement with Iran to not build nuclear weapons. They can just not build them and then there's no need for this like pretty much every other country. > Yes, I said that. Our ruling class and their cronies hate them because they are dirty savage muslims who embarrassed the US multiple times. Ok then they're just at fault too and they weren't following the JCP > People adapt to the environments they are in. The US forces violence on these people, they are violent in return. Tit for tat. Iran forces violence on people in the region including the US so tit for tat again. > Our Secretary of (losing) War has Deus Vult tattooed on him and is in an insane catholic fascist offshoot. They have referenced this war on Iran as being a religious crusade many times. Our ruling class is largely zionist and support them because of end time prophecies. Ok then we should just pursue this holy war given both countries are intent and believe it is a holy war. Whatever. > The only thing they are destabilizing is the US imperialism in the ME and the various fascist Arab rulers that support it. No Iran's fascist and theocratic regime is actively attacking most other countries in the Middle East and destabilizing it. Everyone else is being peaceful. > "Mafia control over oil" doesn't even make sense. Sure it does. The profits flow to the IRGC. > States are entitled to control over territory and waterways near them. If you don't want them to assert their control don't start a fucking war. This just sounds like complaining. It's like if Iran doesn't want to get bombed stop building nuclear weapons. Ok. > Ah yes, there it is. Mask off chauvinism. Not that it was hard to tell to begin with. Funny, of course, coming from a citizen of the nation who still has slavery, exports death globally, and runs torture black sites (not to mention supports the Israelis who rape people with dogs). We don't have slavery so that's wrong. We don't export death globally. > and runs torture black sites (not to mention supports the Israelis who rape people with dogs). Well they deserve it then. > The US can surrender and admit defeat. Food for thought. Nah > Please read, I said millions of Iranians. Nearly a million people died from the GWOT, and that was before genocide was deemed normal and kosher. The suffering will be greater. I did read what you wrote. First Million != millions. Second Iran killed a lot of those people. Finally was no Genocide nor would millions of Iranians die. Iran does murder its own people though. Iraq is much better off now than it was, and the Iraqis themselves will tell you that since they can now that they have a functioning parliament and no longer live under the yoke of a despot like Iran does today. > Anyway, it's clear you think Iran should have no sovereignty or free will and should just acquiesce to any and all US demands. Not much else to be said here. No that's your own invention that has no basis in reality. Iran is a sovereign nation but being a sovereign nation doesn't entitle you to do whatever you want without repercussions. The Iranian people will do much better if they remove the despots who rule them. I'm cheering for them, despite you and your sycophantic behavior toward the IRGC. Clearly nothing else needs to be said here.