Did any of the prompts involve the user trying it and observing that the scrubber barely works and that the topography texturing (the displacement map or normal

Did any of the prompts involve the user trying it and observing that the scrubber barely works and that the topography texturing (the displacement map or normal map or whatever technique GPT-6 picked) is outrageously wrong? I'm no expert in tectonic movements, but I guarantee that continental plates don't slide around without the mountains on them moving along with them. It is shiny, though. (I have personally once vibecoded an interactive 3D viewer. It, too, was a piece of crap. However, I did it with the full understanding that I was making it to solve one particular problem, once, for myself, and that I would just throw it away afterwards after the problem was solved. I used GPT-5.5, IIRC, which was capable of doing the math I needed correctly, but only after a lot of tries and my prompting it with how to do the math. I would like to imagine that 5.6 or 6 would have struggled less with the math.)