> So is claiming "if people don't keep learning the absolute basics about everything they'll be stupid and useless" That’s not a false equivalence, there’s not

> So is claiming "if people don't keep learning the absolute basics about everything they'll be stupid and useless" That’s not a false equivalence, there’s nothing being compared there. Also, I have no idea who you’re quoting, but it sure as hell isn’t me and I can’t find a match online for that phrase. Looks like a straw man argument. > Bruh we don't know shit about I’m not your “bruh”, and when you say we you mean you. Either way, you’re just rehashing the same false equivalence despite saying “so is” (implying you do think the first argument is indeed a false equivalence) so I have no idea why you’re back to that.