Reading is about learning interesting new ideas, enjoying a narrative. The suffering of the author is beside the point. I can sympathize with the notion that A

Reading is about learning interesting new ideas, enjoying a narrative. The suffering of the author is beside the point. I can sympathize with the notion that AI writing currently sucks, but not that it's automatically invalid or deserving of mockery. Maybe one day we'll have far better models. Maybe they'll do a good job without inserting any load-bearing vocabulary. Asking for the prompts is fine, but might not be sufficient. The process iterative, and may incorporate data that won't be published. For example, I recently published a Sol/Fable benchmark article. It would be trivial for anyone to prompt a new version of the article if they had the raw benchmark data, but this data will never be published.