4 ms·

There are so many things wrong with this story before you even get to the headline. From the information in the article, I can’t really blame Google for this o

by nkrisc 17d ago

There are so many things wrong with this story before you even get to the headline. From the information in the article, I can’t really blame Google for this one. This was a series of deliberate blunders on the part of the father. The first blunder was letting a 9 year old have a YouTube account. Putting aside whether a 9 year old should be making videos, the father should have been the one with the account and managing the channel.

wccrawford 17d ago
The article doesn't call it out very loudly, but... "to a company credit card the father had saved to his own Google account, which his son also used" It sounds like the son didn't have an account. It was just the father's account, with billing info attached with no limits.
- nkrisc 17d ago
  But how was the 9 year old able to do any of this unless they had access to some account? It says his son also used it, so he gave a 9 year old access to it. Same difference.
  - msh 17d ago
    Question is if it’s reasonable for the father to guess letting the kid use the account would let the kid do this kind of charge. I would say no and put the blame on google.
    - iteria 16d ago
      As a parent, I would say yes. Anyone who has kids know they spend any money you give them access to. I daughter spent $100 on snacks in a week because it on her school swipe account. Kids are just like this. My kid has her own kids google account where all purchases have to be approved explicitly by me, the parent account. The dad could have done that, but he didn't. This is literally why kids accounts exist. There are many horror stories about kids spending their parents money going bad decades. Every parent has a story. There's no way the dad couldn't have considered this as a possibility. This is setting aside that he shouldn't have mixed his work cards with his personal accounts.
  - wccrawford 17d ago
    Yes, I'm saying the father just let the son use his own account. He didn't bother making a child's account for his son. That's at the root of this.
account42 17d ago
Yes and showing the kid how to spam others when he's unhappy with not having as many viewers ad professional streamers is also questionable.
deleted 16d ago
[deleted]

by nkrisc 17d ago

wccrawford 17d ago

The article doesn't call it out very loudly, but... "to a company credit card the father had saved to his own Google account, which his son also used" It sounds like the son didn't have an account. It was just the father's account, with billing info attached with no limits.

nkrisc 17d ago
But how was the 9 year old able to do any of this unless they had access to some account? It says his son also used it, so he gave a 9 year old access to it. Same difference.
- msh 17d ago
  Question is if it’s reasonable for the father to guess letting the kid use the account would let the kid do this kind of charge. I would say no and put the blame on google.
  - iteria 16d ago
    As a parent, I would say yes. Anyone who has kids know they spend any money you give them access to. I daughter spent $100 on snacks in a week because it on her school swipe account. Kids are just like this. My kid has her own kids google account where all purchases have to be approved explicitly by me, the parent account. The dad could have done that, but he didn't. This is literally why kids accounts exist. There are many horror stories about kids spending their parents money going bad decades. Every parent has a story. There's no way the dad couldn't have considered this as a possibility. This is setting aside that he shouldn't have mixed his work cards with his personal accounts.
- wccrawford 17d ago
  Yes, I'm saying the father just let the son use his own account. He didn't bother making a child's account for his son. That's at the root of this.

account42 17d ago

Yes and showing the kid how to spam others when he's unhappy with not having as many viewers ad professional streamers is also questionable.

deleted 16d ago

[deleted]