4 ms·
> images that were confirmed to be "taken like this on an iPhone" No, because images will be confirmed to have been taken on "this iPhone". The New York Times
by intrasight 10d ago
> images that were confirmed to be "taken like this on an iPhone"
No, because images will be confirmed to have been taken on "this iPhone". The New York Times will be able to publish an article and to attest that the photographs shown were taken by their journalists, and then your user agent will verify that provenience.
- rickdeckard 10d ago>No, because images will be confirmed to have been taken on "this iPhone". Actually the description of Apple makes explicit statements AGAINST that: Quote: Privacy preservation: an outside observer cannot determine whether any pair of reference images were taken by the same device
- Obscurity4340 10d ago> an outside observer An inside observer can tho, and if they know or have it, cant they be subpoenaed and forced to disclose the identity? This sounds pretty bad for journalists/sources. Why is this needed now of all times?
- rickdeckard 10d agoYour guess is as good as mine...
- intrasight 10d agoI think it's great for journalists and journalism because maybe people will stop paying attention to crap on social media, which won't have such verification, and they'll be instead looking at legit journalism.
- Obscurity4340 10d agoNot to contradict but that sounds overly rosy
- mitxela 10d agoAnd then every anonymous source gets revealed, and the government bombs then for the greater good.