3 ms·
So we humans are not a general intelligence then? And the stuff i'm using LLMs daily is just fake? I see i see. I will see myself out of this weird discussion
by Gregkion 2mo ago
So we humans are not a general intelligence then?
And the stuff i'm using LLMs daily is just fake?
I see i see. I will see myself out of this weird discussion while I let an LLM continue doing a lot of interesting things.
- dosisking 2mo ago[flagged]
- zahlman 2mo ago> So we humans are not a general intelligence then? No, because we can, in fact, generally read the rules of a game and then follow them. It's actually a hobby for many of us. > And the stuff i'm using LLMs daily is just fake? This misses the point completely.
- hackinthebochs 2mo ago> generally read the rules of a game and then follow them How many times do you think chess.com prevents illegal moves from being executed? Even Super GM's fall for mate-in-1's occasionally, which is functionally equivalent to missing a pin or a check. This idea that LLMs failing to only ever make legal moves undermines their intelligence doesn't pass the smell test.
- diehunde 2mo agoDo you play chess ? Do you even know what an illegal move is ?
- hackinthebochs 2mo agoIf you have something to contribute to the discussion, just say it
- zahlman 2mo agoChess.com has to accommodate people who haven't learned the rules yet on the low end. On the high end, people are commonly playing fast enough that they're often outlining sequences of multiple "pre-moves" during the opponent's turn in order to avoid losing on time. And no, I would not agree with that functional equivalence.