3 ms·
It seems that in this post a title change was given without a raise. I don't necessarily think that doing that is such a good idea. I know the post says that th
by dangero 14y ago
It seems that in this post a title change was given without a raise. I don't necessarily think that doing that is such a good idea. I know the post says that they were already being compensated fairly. Here's why I think promotions without pay are a bad idea: It gives the employee more incentive to leave, and very little to stay. Superiors tend to give titles pretty easily because it's "free", but I think it may actually cost the company more in the long run. It's a gambler's play.
- drewmck 14y agoExactly. A title bump means that the person will just leverage their position for the same/better position somewhere else with better pay.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- sliverstorm 14y agoAlternatively, a title bump with static pay could mean increased responsibilities without a corresponding increase in pay, which is also incentive to leave.
- randfish 14y agoThat's an incorrect assumption. We gave raises to both Adam & Jamie commensurate with their new titles/roles.