>modern (v5) XFS Is still silly, for the same reasons Hans Reiser documented in an article about Reiser4's design. e.g. its b-tree stores directories and smal

>modern (v5) XFS Is still silly, for the same reasons Hans Reiser documented in an article about Reiser4's design. e.g. its b-tree stores directories and small files in the same level of the tree, which makes directory operations bloated, while also hurting cache lines. Fortunately, neither ZFS, Hammer2 or GEFS suffer from this.