4 ms·
Strap an HR monitor on your chest when you do your next weight lifting routine, have it estimate your calories burned. Spend the same amount of time doing card
by spudlyo 14y ago
Strap an HR monitor on your chest when you do your next weight lifting routine, have it estimate your calories burned. Spend the same amount of time doing cardio at > 70% of your age predicted HR max. I think you'll find it's not even close.
Of course you said fat loss, and perhaps you'll quibble about how much of the calories burned comes from fat vs. muscle, but I think more people are trying to get to a healthy weight rather than achieve a single digit body fat percentage.
- analog 14y ago"I think you'll find it's not even close." Fairly similar for me actually, my heart rate goes pretty high when I'm lifting. When people say healthy weight surely they always mean healthy body fat percentage?
- nordsieck 14y agoSure - cardio is more efficient at burning calories than lifting... while you are exercising. The point is that anaerobic exercise builds muscle, which boosts your basal metabolic rate. Unless you're doing cardio several hours per day, lifting will be much more efficient. edit: minor word change for clarity.
- jimzvz 14y agoEven easier than that is just to not eat those calories in the first place. With resistance training you are not trying to burn calories, you are building muscle. This new muscle will need calories to support itself and will make it easier to lose fat in the future because your body will need more calories to function.
- dredmorbius 14y ago> Strap an HR monitor on your chest when you do your next weight lifting routine I've done that a few times. Consistently 140-160 BPM, peaking higher, sustained over 40-80 minutes. My peak during Tabata sets is 180-190 BPM, so lifting isn't quite at that rate, but it's decidedly aerobic, especially for mid-high range sets (5-20 reps).