> no abstractions, It has. It's called @apply. It works fine. The Tailwind author is wrong about recommending people to avoid @apply. The Tailwind community at

> no abstractions, It has. It's called @apply. It works fine. The Tailwind author is wrong about recommending people to avoid @apply. The Tailwind community at large is mostly wrong about it too (except people that like and use @apply). I don't know how anti-abstraction came to become popular, but if you like semantic classes you can still use Tailwind. (why use Tailwind? It has some nice defaults and a coherent design language) https://css-tricks.com/tailwinds-apply-feature-is-better-than-it-sounds/ https://css-tricks.com/tailwinds-apply-feature-is-better-tha... The anti-abstraction crowd, that push for repeating the same boilerplate over and over again, honestly grinds my gears. Even assembly doesn't make writing boilerplate its ideology (it has macros, and actual subroutines)