It is different, precisely because the end result is not the same - one broadly benefits the public while the other doesn't. Substitute almost any disruptive p

It is different, precisely because the end result is not the same - one broadly benefits the public while the other doesn't. Substitute almost any disruptive public service to see the issue with your line of reasoning. For example - you seem to think that [ bulldozing private property ] to "construct an emergency fire break" is somehow different than [ bulldozing private property ] for any other reason. Never mind that the sort of scraping being objected to is actually harmful to service health while what the wayback machine does is almost entirely unnoticeable.