4 ms·
Clean room is not 100% legally necessary for RE, but I would never touch an LLM to do RE work when there's even a chance the models have been trained on the thi
by kmeisthax 20d ago
Clean room is not 100% legally necessary for RE, but I would never touch an LLM to do RE work when there's even a chance the models have been trained on the thing I ultimately plan to reimplement.
Furthermore, given that Asahi Linux, the biggest game in town when it comes to running Linux on Apple silicon, is trying to be cleanroom, it is incredibly rude of you to not mention LLMs until after showing a page full of LLM-derived firmware ABI. This is a trap for anyone who's trying to be cleanroom.
- jamesgeck0 20d agoThe previous “Part 1” post is very candid about the approach, and the titles of both posts mention prompting.
- outworlder 20d ago> when there's even a chance the models have been trained on the thing I ultimately plan to reimplement. Are you claiming models were trained on proprietary Apple code? How would that even be possible?
- viraptor 20d agoThe title is literally "I Came, I Prompted, I Left". I'm not sure how this can be clearer.
- nicman23 20d agoJarvis, please the gpu
- Orphis 20d agoThere's also a chance the people claiming to do clean room are cheating and took some shortcuts. It's easy to make random claims that are impossible to prove or disprove.