3 ms·
Hi - first congratulations, System One looks really promising. The Doom demo really help me, at least, to understand how System One differs from LLMs. However
by Flere-Imsaho 20d ago
Hi - first congratulations, System One looks really promising.
The Doom demo really help me, at least, to understand how System One differs from LLMs. However the first demo (Side-by-side demonstration) - I'm struggling to understand what is going on here!
- potatoman22 20d agoI think that's to demonstrate its speed
- davideg 20d agoI was confused at first too, but it makes more sense when you read about their primitives. E.g. https://docs.typesafe.ai/primitives/noul https://docs.typesafe.ai/primitives/noul The demo is showing System One producing its output in parallel very quickly and for little cost compared to an LLM generating its answers token-by-token. The "noul" type is used to evaluate a yes/no question and return the probability that the answer is yes. So this demo is showing System One offering much more nuanced responses and specific probabilities compared to an LLM's more crude responses (e.g. LLM shows "true" or "false" compared to "0.9" or "0.07" probabilities that the answer to some question is true).