5 ms·

I have yet to see any evidence that 'children raised properly' would be immune from these practices. It's like saying children from good households never get a

I have yet to see any evidence that 'children raised properly' would be immune from these practices. It's like saying children from good households never get addicted to drugs. Wrong. What's also wrong is that these are not just drugs they're personally identifiable targed drugs specifically designed for children that log all interaction. We can strive to have digital interactions without the unwanted addiction.

mdp2021 17d ago
> 'children raised properly' would be immune from these practices They would because it is an analytical truth - with the exception of 'immune' there, reinforced by the 'addicted to drugs' example: it is not a matter of immunity, it is a matter of acquired protection. You can recognized, you will steer away from it and deal with it properly - in general. > We can strive to have digital interactions without the unwanted addiction That is the basicmost thing: meanwhile, the dystopianists are setting up a world in which nobody will access libraries and museum and universities and conferences, because a proof of identity or other unacceptable alternatives may be requested at entrance. And it remains that limiting access to libraries and museum and universities and conferences to the young, because of "ugly things" found there, is the signal of finished societies corrupt to the marrow.